Competing Interpretations

'There are two approaches to Chaucer: to accept without questioning the interpetations of the pilgrim-poet - or be a little more sceptical. This pilgrim-poet character, who meets all the other pilgrims, is rather naive and accepting of what he sees and hears. Chaucer the poet skilfully creates this figure so that he leaves the reader the chance to interpret more expertly what the other pilgrims are like. Where Chaucer-the-pilgrim sees, for examplem, 'worthiness', we may now interpret that as being remote, superior  - possible arrogant.' - Mr. Wayman

Knight

e.g.. 'He never yet no villainy ne said' - this is interpreted by Chaucer the pilgrim as he never swore or spoke badly of anyone or anything around him, it presents him as noble and kind. Where as the modern reader could interpret him being two faced, and being kind to people when he is around them, but then being rude behind their backs, or being false and pretending to be kind and never say bad things. 

Squire

e.g.. 'He was as fresh as is the month of May' - This is interpreted by Chaucer the pilgrim as him being lively and happy all the time and never down. Where as the modern reader may view him as over enthusiastic, or annoyingly energetic, as he went around singing and playing his flute. Which means it is more than likely so did the other pilgrims.

e.g... 'Courteous he was, lowly, and serviceable' - Chaucer the pilgrim may interpret this as him being a kind gentleman, that helps other people and doesn't judge people on their class or rank and is humble of his achievements. Where as a modern reader might see this as him being fake or him trying to look kind and be chivalrous to help him gain his knighthood.